http://www.ehow.com/about_5370127_positive-effects-video-gaming.html
25+ Positive & Negative Effects of Video Games, According to Studies
Is the author an expert in the field
—–Written other publications?
—–Educational background?
Both the articles authors are seem to experts in writing articles. The authors educational background shows that both are college graduates. The author of the first link has been a writer since 2009. The author of the second link is an expert on kids from personal experience and has been writing articles on kids about the good and bad effects.
What biases might the author hold?
—–Organizations he/she belongs to?
—–Other editorials or biased writings? (This doesn’t exclude an author, but it’s something important to be aware of)
I don’t think that both articles authors are biased about gaming. They have discussed and given a clear explanation of how video games effects children positively. The first article author is an ehow contributor, and the second article (raisesmartkid) author has its own organization link where many articles are written on kids.
Who is the author’s intended audience?
—–Personal experience?
The first articles author’s intended audience were mainly the parents and kids especially the parents of the gamers. It gives a brief description on the positive effects of kids playing video games. The second article’s author’s intended audience is the parents of kids. A brief description of the good and bad effects of gaming is discussed with a clear thought.
How much editing has it gone through?
The first article author is an ehow contributor, so there have been many editing’s before posting the article. The second articles also have many edits because the author presenting a personal experience of kids and writing articles on kids must have gone through a lot of edits when posting.
Any outside forces/pressures which could have affected the source?
None of the two articles presented above have any outside forces/pressures which could have affected the source
Was the source produced for scholarly or for commercial publication?
The first article produced less scholarly as there were some information which seemed a little pointless. The second article produced scholarly information, because I found most of the information that I was looking for in this article.
Is the content consistent with other known facts?
Yes, both the articles have known facts that many people have either gone through this by personal experience, or heard of these facts in an article.
Does the author utilize quality sources?
—–primary vs. secondary sources
—–a wide range of sources from different perspectives
The author of the first article make use of quality sources from other articles.
The author of the second article utilized his personal experience on kids.
Do the generalizations drawn seem logical?
—–Is there a corroborating evidence offered for generalizations?
The generalizations seemed logical in both articles.
When was the source published?
—–Who subscribes?
—–How frequently does it come out?
—–How widely is it circulated?
—–What is the source’s reputation in the academic community?
—–Who funds the journal or magazine?
The specific published date is not specified in both the articles. By looking at the comments of the first article it seemed to be written around the year 2010, and similarly based on the comments of the second article seemed to be written around the year 2011. The first article have been circulated widely on twitter, ehow, facebook, etc. The second article have been circulated widely on twitter, facebook, and google plus.
Special Questions for Websites
—–What was the initial source for the information in question?
—–How frequently is the site updated?
—–By whom is the site funded?
—–Are mechanics and conventions of grammar and usage largely correct?
—–Are citations done, and done properly?
—–Is it possible to verify the author of the specific information on the page and his/her credentials?
The first article is funded by ehow. The second article is updated most of the time. The mechanics and conventions of grammar in both the articles are used correctly. The citation in the first article is done using MLA citation. Both the authors are professional writers. All the sources are validated.